|
|
| thanks |
thank you luvour420 for pointing out my bad grammer,i'll try to improve it,and if i'm not mistaken there should be more than just a couple of pics.of my dick on my profile. hope i spelled everything right,write,rite.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| thanks |
thank you luvour420 for pointing out my bad grammer,i'll try to improve it,and if i'm not mistaken there should be more than just a couple of pics.of my dick on my profile. hope i spelled everything right,write,rite.
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted by
EDDIETHESWINGER |
Posted on January 31, 2012 |
View Comments 0 |
|
| Looking for lady to go to Cap d'agde with this summer |
I've decided it's about time I had a decent holiday for a change so am planning on attending one of the sdc cap d'agde holidays that has been advertised on here.
I don't want to be crass by mentioning money etc but happy to have a high ratio of me to you if that helps any ladies decide;)
Bring on the fun
Eddie
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Educated BBC Free This Weekend From School |
This weekend (Superbowl Sunday)will be a weekend to release my studies (college) and do what I like to do (you know ;-). Anyone looking for some clean, safe, adult fun, hit me? I have no doubt in my mind; I will make a female cum (more than once) this weekend. Certified BBC
Chris (Airborne1) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Best Swingers Clubs |
What are the best swingers clubs in Southern California? We have gone to freedom acres many times but are looking for other clubs as well to change it up. Please tell us what clubs you like and why you like them and maybe we will see you there this weekend. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Beginners in this life style |
My husband and I have just recently started in this lifestyle. We are in our mid 30's and after 13 years of marriage decided it was time for a change. I at first interested in having another female and then a complete swap. We have had 2 experiences since we started in November. One was good and the other was OMG FANTASTIC! Life with three kids is busy and planning is a big part for us. We both work and I go to college on top of work.
I must admit we are not super models even though getting into better health is something we both have started. I would like to be in better shape so maybe we will get more people interested in actually seeing us. Do you have any tips on meeting new people here? We are both pretty shy, though I tend to talk a lot more than he is. I would just like for us to meet people that we can hang out just not in the bedroom but maybe a dinner and movie as well. Is that something people do or is it just the great sex everyone is looking for? |
|
|
|
|
| Posted by
CPL43RDWHEEL |
Posted on January 29, 2012 |
View Comments 3 |
|
| tantra lessons |
Any one know of a place where there is actual hands on oral training for couples ,we both want to learn how to
better give oral ,possibly a tantra type class.any exp out there?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| koh samui - looking for dates |
hey...
we are a young fullswap swinger couple from austria and we stay on koh samui from 29 january till mid of march. where we have a beautiful villa there and we would love to invite you for a nice evening & having fun together. you can also rent our villa, if you like.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Political / Question for/about conservatives |
I understand this is a swinger website, and this is certainly off topic, but we see a lot of political discussions, so we hope you don’t mind helping answer a question that has been vexing us for quite a while.
Why do (some/many, not all) conservatives believe some crazy things (e.g., Obama is a terrorist, Marxist, socialist, fascist, Maoist, racist, Muslim, Kenyan, anti-capitalist, alien, liar, the anti-Christ, a cactus, anti-business, an idiot, anti-work, anti-border control, anti-defense, anti-rich, anti-American, etc.) with absolutely no evidence other than Rush or O'Reilly or a blogger (Drudge et al) or a chain email said they know someone who knows someone who knows someone that… (e.g., saw Barack in a Mosque or beheading babies)...?
Why, if presented with a mountain of independent, verifiable data to support a position contrary to their dogma, they are completely unswayed and respond with “that is not true” or “I don’t believe that” or my favorite “you actually believe scientists (when discussing science) or doctors (when discussing medicine) or economists (when discussing the economy or fiscal/monetary policy) or accountants (when discussing taxes) or Muslims (when discussing Islam)? Why do they think no group of experts can be trusted or believed, yet believe everything they favorite personality says? And why, as more facts provided, the less likely the person will consider even rethinking their beliefs, or be open to the possibility that Rush or Beck or a blogger could have given them inaccurate or incomplete information.
So our question is why do many conservatives so readily accept seemingly obvious fabrications (or completely impossibilities - e.g., one cannot (simultaneously) be fascist, communist, Marxist and socialist) because it comes from a source they “trust” or is on their “side”, despite how unreliable the source may have been in the past or how poor their track record? They seemingly believe anything and everything spoken/written by enough fellow conservatives, regardless if there are any facts or independent information provided to support their position, but reject all information, data and facts if the source is a perceived to be a liberal?
Why does the source matter more than facts to many/most conservatives?
Also why do they attack the source of the correct information with scurrilous character attacks or baseless assaults on someone’s acumen and/or name calling rather than focus on an intelligent discussion of the facts provided, conclusions drawn or a respectful discussion of the question(s)/issue(s) presented?
Additionally often these people will be for greater role of religion in politics yet fight religious freedom for other faiths (e.g., Islam) mercilessly.
We don’t believe this curious, unusual behavior can be explained by simple gullibility, greater susceptibility to propaganda, low IQ or other dismissive explanation or other trivialization. These people (some of whom we met via SDC) are completely open minded to info from all sources when disusing other issues like sports (excluding of course, alleged divine intervention with Tim Tebow lol).
Please don’t respond with liberals are just as guilty, or progressives do the same thing; or sophomoric/unproductive name calling, serious answers only. Thank you!
For the non-US readers, your viewpoint is welcomed as well. Do you have anything similar in your country? Either currently or historical? How was it solved if at all (other than WWII)? |
|
|
|
|
|
| Friends |
Just wanted to say that if you become our friend and then change your mind, please take us off your friends list. We do not want people on our friends list just for show. Please note that we will be doing the same. If we don't hear from you or feel that you are not interested in meeting, we will take you off our list. We're here for friends with benefits and fully understand that you can't please everyone. If we delete you and you feel we were wrong, please let us know asap. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
| Rama kein resort |
Hi ugys anybody who has been to Rama kein resort in Pattaya. we are planning a visit in apr. Could you please help us out with how we can book rooms there...
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Any "Spartacus" the series fans? |
What does the SDC community think of the party scene in "Spartacus" the series in Starz network. I wish all our parties were like that. What do you think? Any Spartacus fan out there? Which is your favorite scene?
Have you attend any party like that? (Not Trapeze, or the lame wanna be Toga parties) |
|
|
|
|
| Posted by
TWO4PLAYD8S |
Posted on January 27, 2012 |
View Comments 20 |
|
| What Do You All Think of This Sneaky, Sleaze-Ball Behavior |
I don't have a clue as to how common this issue is, but it's bugging me, so I'd like some feedback. Over the past few months I've become aware of some extremely dishonest behavior by someone that wrote to us from a couple profile originally. On his couples' profile with his alleged "wife," they only had a single picture of his (let's call him "C") forearm with a bracelet on his wrist. That's it. He wrote to us, and made the usual noises about not being able to use face pictures due to being "professionals" in the area.
OK...We sent him our private eMail address, and he returned a few pictures of his wife alone, and some with him, that were attractive, but otherwise unremarkable. He began bugging us almost immediately (two hours later) as to what we thought about the pictures, which was slightly annoying, but hardly alarm-bell material. We exchanged phone numbers, and had a rather pleasant initial conversation. We were planning to meet at a local club, but he said that "they couldn't go there anymore" because his wife was allergic to cigarette smoke, and the club is a smoking environment. We decided to try to connect somewhere else, at some other time.
Then about an hour later, I see, by the appearance of their couples' profile photo, that he's posted on Speed Dating, to go THAT NIGHT to that SAME club, where his wife couldn't go--where "you can meet us." This was also odd to me, but perhaps her smoking allergy miraculously went away, or it was something else that caused him to blow us off.
"C" starts texting me constantly, asking when we can all get together. I'm not feeling inspired to meet them anymore, as the dishonesty was a deal-breaker; plus I'm truly busy, so I put him off. Then I notice a Single Guy profile that's online at the same time as their couple profile: often. It's in the next town over, it's for a guy listed as 5 years younger, but it has a main profile photo close-up of the guy's eyes. They're blue-green, identifiable and I recognize them instantly. They belong to the same guy from the earlier contact with the local couple. So now I know he's a lying sack of crap, and my drama detectors go off and I just block him. He writes me some alarmed letter to my personal eMail about "no one ever previously blocked him on SDC." All ego-banter, I ignore him, he goes away after an hour.
I now explain this to the Mrs. and she askes to see who it is. I log in to show her, and--you guessed it: He's blocked us back. This is perfect as far as I'm concerned. Then I notice the profile of the guy whose eyes look just like "C's". I figure that we'll log in, there are 11 photos on his Single Guy profile, and we should be able to tell from the photos that he'd eMailed us if I'm right and it's the same guy. Bingo...he blocked us on THIS PROFILE TOO, even though we'd never had the slightest contact with him on that profile. This is all the proof I need. It's clearly him, or how and why would Mr. Single Guy get the idea to block us for absolutely no reason, when we didn't even know that he existed until we put two and two together. I'm gald that I won't be having the slightest contact frm this lying sack of crap any longer. However, I feel helpless that I can't out this guy in good conscience--we KNOW that there are assholes here, why should our corner of the world have any smaller asshole ratio than any other corner of the world. Yet, part of me just wants to out the asshole to protect people whom he might lie to and manipulate in the future. I know I can't rescue the world, but he's just a reptile and he makes my skin crawl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| unreal |
there must be to many single swinging dicks on this site,getting a response from email,you're dreaming,being invited to play,out of the question.maybe i should stick with the lifestyle clubs,i do fairly well there.
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted by
COUPLE4FUN83 |
Posted on January 27, 2012 |
View Comments 35 |
|
| Proper Etiquette when a single male contacts a couple |
This blog is in no way directed at anyone in particular. We just thought we would share our experiences and feelings about when a single male contacts a couple looking for a potential date... This is meant to educational to the single males and hopefully help you have more success getting the dates you seek... First when you write an email to a couple, introduce yourself, we would like to know your name. Next make sure you address both the Husband and the Wife, nothing pisses off a husband more when you don't even acknowledge his existence. Your email should have some substance as to why you want to meet the couple and why we should meet you, Don't just say I want to fuck your wife or how hard you're going to fuck her!! Next always attach a clear face picture, not just a picture of you Dick!!! If we like your email we'll ask for full body pictures anyway... Again this blog is meant to help the single guys get passed the first step of the initial email... If any other couples or single guys have any suggestions feel free to post them here... We are all here to have fun and Great Sex not be degraded or disrespected... Happy Hunting People we'll see you soon!!!
Trish & Tim |
|
|
|
|
|
| Trapeze vs. Club Hedonism |
Can anyone compare the two clubs for me ? We've been to the trapeze several times but have not been to club Hedonism. Is there a big difference in ages of the people attending either club? Is the music substantially different? Do you need to bring your own Alcohol to CH? Anything anyone can add would be great, thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted by
TICKLEANDTEASE |
Posted on January 26, 2012 |
View Comments 0 |
|
| North London |
Is anyone interested in going to a large house party this fri or sat in north London?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Low IQ & Conservative Beliefs Linked to Prejudice |
There's no gentle way to put it: People who give in to racism and prejudice may simply be dumb, according to a new study that is bound to stir public controversy.
The research finds that children with low intelligence are more likely to hold prejudiced attitudes as adults. These findings point to a vicious cycle, according to lead researcher Gordon Hodson, a psychologist at Brock University in Ontario. Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, the study found. Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice, Hodson wrote in an email to LiveScience.
"Prejudice is extremely complex and multifaceted, making it critical that any factors contributing to bias are uncovered and understood," he said.
Controversy ahead
The findings combine three hot-button topics.
"They've pulled off the trifecta of controversial topics," said Brian Nosek, a social and cognitive psychologist at the University of Virginia who was not involved in the study. "When one selects intelligence, political ideology and racism and looks at any of the relationships between those three variables, it's bound to upset somebody."
Polling data and social and political science research do show that prejudice is more common in those who hold right-wing ideals that those of other political persuasions, Nosek told LiveScience. [7 Thoughts That Are Bad For You]
"The unique contribution here is trying to make some progress on the most challenging aspect of this," Nosek said, referring to the new study. "It's not that a relationship like that exists, but why it exists."
Brains and bias
Earlier studies have found links between low levels of education and higher levels of prejudice, Hodson said, so studying intelligence seemed a logical next step. The researchers turned to two studies of citizens in the United Kingdom, one that has followed babies since their births in March 1958, and another that did the same for babies born in April 1970. The children in the studies had their intelligence assessed at age 10 or 11; as adults ages 30 or 33, their levels of social conservatism and racism were measured. [Life's Extremes: Democrat vs. Republican]
In the first study, verbal and nonverbal intelligence was measured using tests that asked people to find similarities and differences between words, shapes and symbols. The second study measured cognitive abilities in four ways, including number recall, shape-drawing tasks, defining words and identifying patterns and similarities among words. Average IQ is set at 100.
Social conservatives were defined as people who agreed with a laundry list of statements such as "Family life suffers if mum is working full-time," and "Schools should teach children to obey authority." Attitudes toward other races were captured by measuring agreement with statements such as "I wouldn't mind working with people from other races." (These questions measured overt prejudiced attitudes, but most people, no matter how egalitarian, do hold unconscious racial biases; Hodson's work can't speak to this "underground" racism.)
As suspected, low intelligence in childhood corresponded with racism in adulthood. But the factor that explained the relationship between these two variables was political: When researchers included social conservatism in the analysis, those ideologies accounted for much of the link between brains and bias.
People with lower cognitive abilities also had less contact with people of other races.
"This finding is consistent with recent research demonstrating that intergroup contact is mentally challenging and cognitively draining, and consistent with findings that contact reduces prejudice," said Hodson, who along with his colleagues published these results online Jan. 5 in the journal Psychological Science.
|
|
|
|